How best to steer clear of the stable retirement conundrum

Published Sep 25, 1999

Share

The single biggest concern for people at retirement is to secure a stable

and predictable income.

One that hopefully will increase with inflation and protect your capital.

Add to that an income that does not attract too much tax.

Of course, such an animal is impossible to find today. And yet many have

chosen to move from an income that resembles the above, as in a defined

benefit pension fund, which is guaranteed, to one more risky, as in a

defined contribution fund, where nothing is guaranteed.

At retirement, members of such funds are faced with having to make their

own choices with regard to procuring an income for life.

And such a decision is not only complex, but can lead to hardship years

later, when it may be too late.

The safest option might appear to be to shove all your money into a bank

offering the highest interest and then to sit back. Over the short term

such an approach has not been a bad one, but with today`s decline in

interest rates, investors in these instruments are back to where they`ve

been for years: a negative return after inflation and taxes.

Over the past 30 years, savers have only enjoyed short periods where the

return on fixed deposits and mortgage bonds has protected their capital

after taxes and inflation. The past twelve months has been one of those

rare periods, now rapidly disappearing as interest rates decline.

On average you`ve lost money having all of it in the bank. While the

initial impact is not all that evident, even a small reduction in the

purchasing power of your capital could, over time, catch up on you. Ask

anyone who retired 20 years ago and did not have some of their capital in a

growth investment. The tax on fixed investments is iniquitous and needs to

be addressed.

No wonder investors are so desperate to find alternatives that can at least

offer them an opportunity of earning a higher income after tax, without

having to resort to unscrupulous operators offering slightly higher

interest than ones offered by the market place.

A popular alternative is a matured endowment with an assurance company.

Despite the recent publicity concerning the possible taxation of these

instruments, which is misplaced, a matured endowment still offers investors

an excellent alternative to procure a stable and possibly growing income,

with the chance of capital growth.

No wonder investors are prepared to pay a premium for a mature endowment.

This type of investment offers:

* A choice of portfolios, including an offshore one, while the portfolio is

taxed at 30 percent of all income earned in the fund;

* Withdrawals from the fund are not taxed, as taxes have already been paid

by the assurance company concerned; and

* Withdrawals can be made on a regular or ad hoc basis. However, the rate

of withdrawal from the policy does not exceed the growth in the value of

the policy.

In a perfect world, it would be possible to draw say 10 percent of the

value of the portfolio, while the portfolio grows at 15 percent. Such a

scenario would allow the income to be increased over time, while the

capital also continued to grow.

However, this is where it pays to understand the importance of the

underlying portfolio. It can suffer a capital reduction in times of stock

market turmoil. And if you continued to withdraw at the same rate, your

capital will come under pressure.

If such a scenario applies to you, check the market value of your

investment and adjust your income withdrawal.

The same theory holds for an investor who has a portfolio of shares or unit

trusts and makes regular withdrawals in order to provide an income. Draw

more than the growth of your portfolio and the capital will shrink. And

once this process starts, it`s difficult to turn it around in a hurry.

Related Topics: